Skip to main content

About your Search

20121001
20121031
STATION
FOXNEWS 14
KTVU (FOX) 5
WBFF (FOX) 4
WTTG 3
LANGUAGE
English 40
Search Results 0 to 39 of about 40 (some duplicates have been removed)
. >> senator durbin, israel's embassador to the united states says in the "new york times" article israel should not be rewarded with one-on-one talks with the u.s. but instead should get tougher sanctions. >> the president has put together a strong global coalition imposing sanctions on the iranians including not only europe, which made a dramatic impact on the iranian economy but russia as well. it's had impact. this month in october, the currency in iran declined 40% in value. there's unrest in the streets and leaders are feeling it. that's what we wanted to do. this is an indication, a clear indication, the sanctions regime that president obama's put together with israel and many nations around the world is putting pressure on iran to sit down and acknowledge they cannot have a nuclear weapon. it's a positive step forward. >> briefly, why, if we have this information coalition, why not continue talks in the t5 plus one, why one-on-one instead? >> there are many options. i'm not saying one is better than the other. if direct negotiations are a path toward a peaceful resolution with ira
the president of the united states out into the public arena, not telling him about an attack in april and june, and, tell me about the consulate attack in benghazi, what do you think about it, and the president said i don't know and i find that inconceivable. and this is going to be a case study, studied for years of a break down of national security, and, failed presidential leadership and senior members of the obama administration, failed miserably and the benghazi, libya conflict was becoming a death trap and the british left and the red cross left, because of the deteriorating security environment and we were requesting additional security and it was denied because we wanted to normalize relationships with a nonexistent government and we should have closed the consulate long before september 11th, or heavily reinforced it and i put that on the president of the united states. this is a nation security break down, before, during and after the attacks. >> chris: we all agree the president doesn't get into the weeds and decided the security level in benghazi, but given all of these warnings, w
and more interested in getting to the bottom of this than the president of the united states. he feels personal responsibility for every representative he sends around the world. he knew christevens. he admired chris stevens. so look, we want to get to the bottom of it and the first order of business is to bring to justice those who committed this heinous pant an act and sy find out what adjustments need to be made to further secure our diplomats around the world. >> chris: does the president take personal responsibility rest.e fact that rest. petersburged requests for -- repeated requests for more security were made and rejected. does he take personal responsibility for that? >> at the topline level the president of the united states is responsible for everything that happens on his watch. these were judgments made by the security folks at the state department and, of course, we are going review that whole process and see how those decisions are made and why those decisions were made and how we adjust in the future to make sure that we are giving our diplomats the maximum protection w
line level the president of the united states is responsible for everything that happens under his -- on his watch. these were judgments that were made by the security folks at the state department and, of course we will review that whole process and see how those decisions are made, why those decisions were made, and, how we adjust in the future to make sure that we are giving our diplomats the maximum protection we can. the reality is, that many of these folks serve in dangerous places in the world and you can't 100% guarantee anything but we want to get as close to 100% as we can and that is why these investigations are moving forward. >> chris: i want to ask you about this question of personal responsibility, by the president, because, in the debate the vice president also blamed the intelligence community for the false reports that came out immediately after, about the idea that this was a spontaneous demonstration that ran amok. in fact, the top state department official said this week he was asked about that and this is what he said: "that is a question that you would have t
in getting to the bottom than the president of the united states, he feels personal responsibility for every representative he and ends around the world and he knew chris stevens, he admired chris stevens, so, look, we want to get to the bottom of it and the first order of business is to bring to justice those who committed the heinous act and, secondly, find out what went wrong and what adjustments need to be made to further secure our diplomats around the world. >> chris: let me ask you directly, does the president take personal responsibility for the fact that repeated requests for more security were made, and were rejected and that that may have contributed to the death of those four americans? does he take personal responsibility for that? >> chris, at the to say line level the president of the united states is responsible for everything that happens under his -- on his watch. these were judgments that were made by the security folks at the state department and, of course we will review that whole process and see how those decisions are made, why those decisions were made, and, how we a
the incumbent president of the united states has. i hear the handwringerring in washington and washington wants to talk about process. come out into these states with us and see what we are talking about and the forceful case we are making for economic opportunity. see the specific plans we are putting on the table. the bold solutions. mitt romney has never once asked me to temper anything down. he said go out there and sell this. >> chris: you talk about the handwringerring. there was a report this weekend that you have been talking to conservative commentators and trying to get them to stay on board and not to jump ship and get too discouraged but in the course of the conversations you admitted the campaign has made missteps. question, what missteps? >> first of all, 47% mitt acknowledges himself. that was an inarticulate way of describing more people have become dependent on government because they have no opportunity. it was an inarticulate way to describe how we are trying to reduce dependency to get people off welfare and back to work. we had some missteps but at the end of the day the ch
president of the united states has, so, i hear the hammering in washington and, the process, and, come out into these states and see what we are talking about. see the forceful case we are making for economic opportunity, see the specific plans we're putting on the table, the bold solutions, mitt romney never once asked me to temper anything down, he said go out there and sell this. >> chris: you talk about the hand-wringing and there was a report, this weekend, that you were talking to conservative commentators, trying to get them to stay on board and not to jump ship and get discouraged, but in the course of the conversations you have admitted the campaign made missteps. >> i think, first of all, 47%, mitt, acknowledges himself, that was and in articulate way of describing how we are worried, more people are dependents on government, because they have no economic opportunities and, what we are trying to do to create upper mobility and reduce dependency by getting people off welfare and back to work and yes, we have had missteps, but at the end of the day the choice is really clear. and w
are hearing the president of the united states based on his own words, issued a directive immediately after he found out about the firefight saying he wanted to be sure the people on the ground were safe and they are getting what they needed. it didn't happen. this means either the president's order was not followed which would be a breakdown in terms of the white house procedure. or, it means the order wasn't issued. we need to find out about this. it is not about politics. it is a very serious situation. after the fact, of course, there has been a lot of confusion about what happened and why it happened. it show as lack of leadership. it shows a policy in disarray. it is perfectly appropriate to have the questions. senator john mccain and i sent a letter two week ago to secretary panetta but we have not heard anything. and we sent another letter yesterday about the order issued by the president. why wasn't it followed? it makes no sense. >>chris: we have a couple of minutes left, senator warner, yes, this investigation is going to happen after election day, but we will not know the facts whe
was fundamentally and dangerously wrong and the president of the united states rather than the next day finding out what happened went on a campaign trip to las vegas and colorado. >>chris: wait, wait, wait, go ahead. >> if romney thought this would get them there, he would, and he wanted it on the front door he could. the one truth that has been spoken here today is he wanted us to be on the economy. it doesn't mean the other stuff is not there but that is what he wants us to be on. >>chris: what did you make of the clear and discomfort, my words that the two democratic senators, both members of the senate intelligence committee had when i asked if the drone over benghazi was armed. >> my guess they cannot say anything about what the drones were doing. i am not sure they can verify this were drones over head. i am saying, as members of the intelligence committee they have to be more wonderful than me and juan and you. karl: that means they were armed. >> one of the problems it has fall be to this news organization, fox news, and a couple of others, to do all the heavy lifting on this story and th
of the united states, based on his own words, issued a directive immediately after he found out about the firefight, saying, he wanted to be sure those people on the ground were safe and were getting what they needed. it didn't happen. this means either that the president's order was not followed, which would be a break down in terms of the white house procedure, or, it means the order was not issued. we need to find out about this, it is not about politics, it is a very serious situation. after the fact, of course, there has been a lot of confusion about what happened and why. i think the bottom line for us, it shows a lack of leadership. and it shows the policy in disarray and is perfectly appropriate to ask these questions, as you know, john mccain and i sent a letter, month than two weeks ago, to secretary panetta, asking for some of these answers and we haven't heard anything and we sent another letter, yesterday, with the additional information we're hearing directly from the president about the order that he issued. why wasn't it followed? this makes no sense. >> chris: senator
are paying the tax then membership dues. they were displaced in western europe and the united states>> they said we can do better. >> we can create giant constituencies that reinforce each other. >> you talk about 50,000 employees in the new york city welfare system. every one of those is a voert also. they don't like to see the systems cut. cut. >> you argue that these mu tile aid societies would take care of people who need help if they were still around they would do a better job if there were 50,000 plies? >> it would, can and should. no question about it. one example that works well it is invisible to people. out there 24-hours a day. you can call someone to talk to if you have an alcohol problem. there are meetings every night of the week people can go to to feel like they have a problem. >> it works better than government rehabilitation programs. >> thank you. thank you tom palmer. next, a new place without a welfare state. we will take you there next. we will take you there next. [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus presents the cold truth. i have a cold, and i took nyquil, b
are in the united states senate. $10 trillion is what he inherited and you should know that the deficit is now around $15 trillion or $16 trillion. it is not true. you said it and you are repeating governor romney. >> he has added more debt than any other president. >> that is not true, senator. that is not true. that is not true. president bush left him with a $10 trillion deficit. >> bush added 4.8 over -- >> chris: guys. i said i was going to be tougher than jim lehrer and i'm going to be. let's discuss a big issue that never came up in the debate and that is the fiscal cliff coming at the end of the year, sequestration it is called unless the president and congress work out a deal. under what is called the warren act employers and this is not just federal employers, all companies must tell workers 60 days in it advance of mass layoffs but ten days ago the obama administration told companies with federal contracts to ignore the law, don't notify the workers of the coming layoffs as part of the fiscal sequestration and it would pick up the lawsuits resulting. what is wrong with that? >> anot
... >> well, senator... senator. >> four years of trillion dollar deficit. >> you know, you are in the united states. >> it is not true he said he'd -- >> $10 trillion is what he inherited and you should know the deficit is now 15 or $16 trillion, and it's not true, when -- you say it and you repeated it. >> he has added more debt than any other president. >> that is not true. >> any other president. >> no, it is not true. >> chris: let me just -- >> president bush left him with a $10 trillion deficit. >> 4.7 -- >> i said idle be tougher than jim lehrer and i'm going to be. what didn't come up in the debate is the fiscal cliff of tax increases come at the end of the year, sequestration as it is called, unless the president and congress work out a deal. under what is act, employers, this is not just federal employers, all companies, must tell workers, 60 days in advance, over mass layoffs, but ten days ago, the obama administration told companies with federal contracts to ignore the law, don't notifier workers of these coming layoffs, as part of the fiscal cliff, sequestration, and, it would p
Search Results 0 to 39 of about 40 (some duplicates have been removed)